The definition and meaning of progressive tax is income tax that takes a greater percentage of high-earners’ incomes and a smaller proportion from lower-income earners. A progressive tax structure is one in which a person’s or household’s tax liability rises as a fraction of income as earnings increase.
Progressive and Regressive Tax
It is called progressive because the tax rate progresses from a low to a high rate. It is the opposite of regressive tax, which takes a higher percentage of income from low earners compared to that of their richer counterparts.
The term may apply to just income tax or the tax system as a whole. For example, if ultra-luxury cars have a proportionally higher sales tax placed on them, the tax will hit higher earners and rich people more than the rest of the population. Progressive tax applies to both individuals and businesses.
In a progressive tax system, the proportion of people’s income that is taxed increases the more they earn. Somebody who earns $10 million per year pays a larger fraction of his or her income in tax than somebody who is paid just $15,000 annually.
According to financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com, progressive taxation is:
“A system of taxation in which persons or corporations are assessed at a greater percentage of their income according to the theoretical ability to pay. That is, taxpayers pay more in taxes if they earn more in income.”
“For example, taxpayers may pay 25% of their income in taxes up to a certain amount, and 35% of everything earned over that amount.”
Progressive tax – video explanation
Progressive tax common worldwide
All the advanced economies (rich countries) have progressive taxation systems, including the United States. In 2016, Americans earning less than $9,275 of taxable income were liable to pay 10% of that in income tax, while those earning in excess of $415,050 – the benchmark cutoff – faced rates of up to 39.6%.
In the United Kingdom, which also has a progressive tax system, earners get a tax-free personal allowance of £11,000. From £11,001 to £43,000 the basic rate of 20% applies, then 40% from £43,001 to £150,000, and 45% for any income over £150,000.
Canadians pay 15% on the first $45,916 of income, then 20.5% on the next $45,915, twenty-six percent on the next $50,522, twenty-nine percent on the next $60,447, and 33% on income over $202,800. According to the Canada Revenue Agency, all figures apply to taxable income.
As far as people’s incomes are concerned, the United States has a progressive tax system. Income tax ranges from 10% to 39.6%. (Data Source: Wikipedia)
Progressive tax – pros & cons
The system reduces the tax burden on individuals at the lower end of the socioeconomic ladder. Low-wage earners end up having more take home pay – cash in their pockets.
People on lower incomes tend to spend most of what they earn. If they have more to spend, this stimulates demand in the economy, which is good for GDP (gross domestic product) growth and employment.
As far as the government is concerned, progressive taxation means more tax revenue – the system allows the government to collect more taxes than regressive or flat taxes, because tax rates are indexed to increase as earnings go up.
Some people say that progressive taxation is fairer – those with the greatest resources can afford to pay more, and ‘so they should’.
People who are against this type of tax system say it is discriminatory against high-income individuals and rich people. It is simply a form of income redistribution.
They also point out that when the government gets hold of people’s money, it does not spend it wisely – a very small proportion of government spending goes to helping poor people, they claim.
Very steep progressive tax systems – where the top rate is extremely high – discourage hard work and ambition. “Why should I bother to work hard, create lots of jobs and earn loads of money, if the government then takes most of it from me,” critics say.
In the late 1960s, Britain’s tax system hit rich people extremely hard – Prime Minister Harold Wilson raised the top rate of income tax to 83%. The result was that thousands of wealthy individuals emigrated.
The following rich people left the UK – they became tax exiles – in the late 1960s and 1970s: Shirley Bassey (singer), Michael Caine (actor), John Barry (composer of 11 James Bond movies), Marc Bolan (musician), Jethro Tull (musician), Tom Jones (singer), members of the group Pink Floyd, and Rod Steward (singer). Most of them returned when income tax rates for the well-off went down.
According to the British Government: “The standard Personal Allowance is £11,000, which is the amount of income you don’t have to pay tax on. Your Personal Allowance may be bigger if you claim Marriage Allowance or Blind Person’s Allowance. It’s smaller if your income is over £100,000.”
Progressive income tax – a brief history
Governments have been taxing their citizens progressively for thousands of years. In the early days of the Roman Republic, people were liable for taxes according to how much wealth and property they owned. Rates were considerably lower than they are today. Under normal circumstances – when there were no great wars to finance – the tax rate was 1% of property value. Even in times of war, this rate rarely went higher than 3%.
These taxes on Romans were levied against homes, other real estate and land, animals, personal items, monetary wealth, and slaves.
By 167 B.C., the Roman Empire was so powerful and wealthy that its citizens in the Italian peninsula paid no taxes at all.
By the 1st century, after considerable Roman expansion, Augustus Caesar introduced a flat poll tax on each adult citizen and a wealth tax of approximately 1%.
Economic historians say that the first modern income tax was introduced by British Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger in December 1798. The British government needed funds to pay for equipment and weapons for the French Revolutionary War.
Pitt’s new progressive income tax started at a levy of 2 pennies in the pound – 1/120 – on annual incomes greater than £60, or £5,696 as of 2015., and went up to a maximum of 10% (two shillings) for those earning more than £200.
Pitts’ target was to raise £10 million – by the end of 1799 the total reached slightly more than £6 million. The tax continued being levied until 1802, when Henry Addington (1757-1844), who was Prime Minister from 1801 to 1804, abolished it during the Peace of Amiens.
Addington reintroduced income tax in 1803, when hostilities with France recommenced. In 1816, one year after the Battle of Waterloo, it was again abolished.
Sir Robert Peel (1788-1850), who was Prime Minister from 1834 to 1835 and 1841 to 1846, reintroduced income tax in the Income Tax Act 1842. In his election campaign in 1841, Peel, a Conservative, had argued strongly against any type of income tax. However, a growing budget deficit was getting out of control and a new source of funds was desperately needed.
Peel’s new income tax, which was based on Addington’s model, was imposed on citizens earning more than £150 per year (£12,735 as of 2015). This ‘temporary’ measure stuck, and soon became a permanent feature of the country’s taxation system.
William Gladstone (1809-1898), who was Prime Minister on four separate occasions and Chancellor of the Exchequer (Finance Minister) four times, kept the progressive income tax from 1852, despite vociferous objections from the Conservative opposition. Gladstone started off as a Conservative and then became a Liberal. By the 1860s, both Conservative and Liberal lawmakers grudgingly accepted that income tax had become a permanent fixture of Britain’s fiscal system.
The first progressive income tax in the United States appeared when the Revenue Act of 1862 was established. The Act, which repealed the flat tax, was signed by President Abraham Lincoln.
The Sixteenth Amendment of the US Constitution, adopted in 1913, allowed Congress to levy all income taxes with no apportionment requirement. By the middle of 20th century, virtually every country across the globe had implemented some kind of progressive tax.