There has been a quiet battle raging in the computer industry for more than four decades now, and it is still going on. There are other PC manufacturers out there, but let’s be honest: they wouldn’t be where they are now if it weren’t for Bill Gates. The brains behind the personal computer (also known as a PC). Forget about the rock if you don’t know this; chances are you’ve been living in a subterranean layer 60 feet below the surface of the earth your whole existence.
Another well-known desktop computer business, Apple, was founded by the ‘other’ Steve Jobs (may he rest in peace). You’ve almost certainly heard of them. Apple is regarded as the Rolls Royce of computer technology in the eyes of customers. Compared to most of their rivals, their designs are more elegant, their operating systems are more virus-resistant, and the UI is very user-friendly. For these reasons, their price tag is a bit more than that of other Microsoft or “PC” goods on the market.
What about video editing: PC or Mac?
The question is, how does this sense of power transfer into the realm of video editing. What about editors? Do they favor Macs as well, or is PC a superior choice because of its ability to be more customized?
Let’s discuss it in detail!
The majority of companies like Wondershare Filmora have designed their software to be compatible with Mac. So, let’s suppose you’re an editor who’s at a crossroads and is considering whether to put a significant amount of money into one or the other.
Which direction should you take?
Obviously, I don’t want to go into a long and tedious discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of Macs. Still, the notion that Apple Macs are more costly per unit of performance like auto reframe or screen record mac is a fallacy and one that geeks like me are wary of debunking. I still have a Mac Pro at home that I use to run Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects, and other video editing Mac or audio editing mac software.
Many creative individuals believe that the GUI is much more beautiful and that the user experience is far superior – an attitude that has kept me perplexed for the last twenty years by Microsoft’s failure to create windows that do not appear and feel clunky, despite many attempts.
As a result, as a consumer, I have traditionally favored Apple Macintosh computers. And I’m certain that millions of filmmakers and musicians from all around the globe share my viewpoint. They were simpler to operate, remained technically viable for a longer period of time, and were much easier to set up with professional hardware without having to deal with the nightmare of IRQs and hardware conflicts that plagued home computers.
Also, in the late 1990s, Apple purchased an incomplete video editing system from Macromedia, which was eventually renamed Final Cut Pro a few years later. Previous versions of Final Cut Pro were an excellent and simple-to-learn editing system. It offered a more inexpensive and scalable alternative to Avid Media Composer and Media 100 for millions of film producers. It was fantastic. Things were looking up.
Apple ultimately became weary of relying on professional users to persuade the general public to purchase costly, high-specced Macs that they didn’t really need in the first place. Apple intended to offer everyone flat-panel iMacs, phones, and larger phones without GSM – iPads – to compete with the competition. You can’t really perform professional work on an iPad, unfortunately.
Aside from this realization, Apple also realized that their primary target market consisted of aspirational rather than genuine film producers. Consequently, they stopped developing their problematic 32-bit FCP and rebranded a powerful version of iMovie as the official FCP software instead. Let’s not go down that road. We all departed at the same time.
Microsoft has been gradually releasing better and more reliable versions of Windows at some point down the line, but it wasn’t clear when. Avid had been devoting increasing resources to the PC version of Media Composer in recent months. By 2008/2009, a significant number of Avid Media Composer suites were operating on personal computers.
Your Mac may be used to create high-quality videos if you use the finest video editing software choices available to you.
Why video editing in Mac is getting popular nowadays?
In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of people who are interested in video editing.
With the rise of video-based social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok, many people who would otherwise not have considered editing have been drawn into the realm of video editing. Furthermore, since more individuals have started to spend more time at home and work from home, software that allows them to edit movies from their computers has become increasingly popular.
There are hundreds of video editing programs available on the market, each with a unique set of capabilities and a distinct price tag. Given a large number of software choices like Filmora Wondershare available, it may be difficult to decide which software could be the best fit for your requirements and how much you should anticipate spending.
Even QuickTime, whose video technology has served as the foundation for virtually all professional non-linear editing software for more than 25 years, is likely to be phased away in the near future. Apple has made the decision to discontinue support for the PC.
I’m not even sure I’ll be able to bring myself to purchase another Mac in order to run Adobe CS at home. Perhaps the only valid arguments are as follows:
So, to summarize, I believe your remark, “Why do people use Macs for video editing?” was correct. Macs were used by people who worked in the film industry. They were, without a doubt, superior instruments. Apple was created to appear stylish by us (there are millions of us). Apple Macs were used to create hundreds of thousands of films and recordings, proving your assertion to be correct.
Interesting Related Article: “Why Video Editing for Mac Is the Only Skill You Really Need in Future“