Checklist thumbnail

Checklist helps determine whether employee training is effective

Published: 15:15, November 26, 2018

A new checklist can help trainers and managers determine whether employee training has been effective. Businesses and other organizations spend billions of dollars annually on employee training. Being able to tell how effective specific training measures have been has always been a challenge. Researchers at Rice University and the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) have created a checklist. Managers, assessors, and trainers can use it when developing, implementing, and evaluating employee training courses and programs.

Ashley M Hughes, Stephanie Zajac, Jacqueline M Spencer, and Eduardo Salas wrote about their checklist in the International Journal of Training and Development (citation below).

The authors say that their list provides practical guidance for every stage of implementing training programs.

They developed the checklist by gathering and analyzing data from scientific research on learning and organizational training. They then figured out the best ways to achieve ‘training transfer.’ According to a Rice University press release, training transfer is the “translation of knowledge to skills for better performance.”

Ashley Hughes, an Assistant Professor of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences at UIC, said:

“Training transfer is vital across all industries, but among health care organizations the stakes are arguably higher.”

Checklist for assessing effectiveness of training programs
In an Abstract that precedes the main article in the journal, the authors wrote: “The checklist provides evidence‐based, actionable guidance for practitioners before, during, and after training program implementation to increase utilization of trained knowledge and skills on the job.”

Checklist – translating the science into a practice tool

Eduardo Salas, Chair of and Professor of Rice University’s Department of Psychological Sciences, said:

“There is a science of training and, surprisingly, most organizations are not aware of it or ignore it. This checklist is an attempt to translate the science into a practical tool.”

The authors divided the checklist into three ‘yes’ and ‘no’ sections. The trainer, supervisor, HR manager, or assessor goes through them before, during, and after employees undergo training.

HR stands for Human Resources, a department or organization that trains, hires, and administers the workforce.

Checklist – ‘Before’ section

This section tells you whether the training program will meet the needs of the organization or company. It asks questions like:

  • “Has the facility identified which employees will attend the training.”
  • “Are there policies and procedures in place to support training?”

Checklist – ‘During’ section

The ‘During’ section is all about the training’s content. It asks questions like:

  • “Are trainees provided opportunities to actively participate during training?”
  • “Was the training developed using a valid training strategy and design?”

Checklist – ‘After’ section

These questions can be asked several times. They check whether employees remember what they learned. It also determines whether they need more help. Below are two examples of the questions in this section:

  • “Are managers provided with tools and advice to support the use of learned knowledge and skills on the job?”
  • “Does the evaluation reveal that the training should be adapted?”

The authors hope that their checklist will help make sure that the skills, knowledge, and attitudes that employees learned in training will improve their job performance.

Prof. Hughes said:

“We believe the checklist will eliminate unnecessary training, enable more motivated, engaged and effective staff and possibly serve as a gateway for cultural change within an organization.”

Citation

“A checklist for facilitating training transfer in organizations,” Ashley M Hughes, Stephanie Zajac, Jacqueline M Spencer, and Eduardo Salas. International Journal of Training and Development, November 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12141.

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

What makes a product vintage, and why the distinction matters to retailers

Nov 15, 2026

EU business social media use rises, but a gap remains by company size

Nov 15, 2026

Why startups may benefit from testing locally before expanding abroad

Nov 14, 2026

Novel product ideas can be harder to try but more rewarding afterward

Nov 14, 2026

What is in an online cart can influence whether shoppers check out

Nov 14, 2026

Subscription plans can miss customers who would save money, Lyft research finds

Nov 14, 2026

Workers with worse shifts than their colleagues were more likely to leave, restaurant study finds

Nov 14, 2026

More product options do not always reach more customers, cosmetics study finds

Nov 14, 2026

EU household spending grew in 2025 as communication purchases led gains

Nov 13, 2026

Ad experiments can help predict which campaigns drive additional sales

Nov 13, 2026

Browser choice screens lifted Firefox usage in Europe, researchers find

Nov 13, 2026

Online product rankings can cut shipping costs without reducing sales, experiment finds

Nov 13, 2026

Large companies lead EU service exports, but smaller firms dominate in some markets

Nov 13, 2026

Cart reminder timing is linked to different shopper responses

Nov 12, 2026

AI labels changed how consumers judged food images in three experiments

Nov 12, 2026

Shared AI tools were linked to higher sales for small online sellers

Nov 12, 2026

An image ad people like may not be the one they remember

Nov 12, 2026

Upfront rental prices changed competition as nightly rates rose in a study

Nov 12, 2026

Showing payment options earlier can influence online purchase decisions

Nov 11, 2026

Cash-back offers for positive reviews brought more responses but fewer repeat purchases

Nov 11, 2026