Samsung

Samsung to pay Apple $548 million in long-running patent dispute

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 00:35, December 5, 2015

Samsung will pay Apple Inc. $548 million for damages in a long-running patent dispute between the two tech firms.

Apple and Samsung filed a joint case management statement with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday, in which Samsung said it has “has made arrangements to complete payment to Apple.”

If Apple sends an an invoice on Friday then Samsung said it will make the payment by Dec. 14.

The legal battle started when Apple sued Samsung in April 2011 over claims that its rival had violated key Apple patents by producing a phone with a strikingly similar look and feel of Apple’s flagship iPhone.

The following year, in 2012, a jury ruled in favor of the California-based company, awarding $1.05 billion in damages.

In light of the latest developments, Samsung has agreed to pay half of the amount. But the Korean tech giant also said that it has the right to collect reimbursemen for some of the money depending on further developments in the case, including any future rulings from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Apple said that it “disputes Samsung’s asserted rights to reimbursement.”

A Samsung spokeswoman, Danielle Meister Cohen, said:

“We are disappointed that the court has agreed to proceed with Apple’s grossly exaggerated damages claims regardless of whether the patents are valid.

“While we’ve agreed to pay Apple, we remain confident that our products do not infringe on Apple’s design patents, and we will continue to take all appropriate measures within the legal system to protect our products and our intellectual property.”

The case is Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 11cv1846, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose).

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

A bank tested AI customer twins for marketing, with mixed lessons for businesses

Nov 15, 2026

What makes a product vintage, and why the distinction matters to retailers

Nov 15, 2026

EU business social media use rises, but a gap remains by company size

Nov 15, 2026

Why startups may benefit from testing locally before expanding abroad

Nov 14, 2026

Novel product ideas can be harder to try but more rewarding afterward

Nov 14, 2026

What is in an online cart can influence whether shoppers check out

Nov 14, 2026

Subscription plans can miss customers who would save money, Lyft research finds

Nov 14, 2026

Workers with worse shifts than their colleagues were more likely to leave, restaurant study finds

Nov 14, 2026

More product options do not always reach more customers, cosmetics study finds

Nov 14, 2026

EU household spending grew in 2025 as communication purchases led gains

Nov 13, 2026

Ad experiments can help predict which campaigns drive additional sales

Nov 13, 2026

Browser choice screens lifted Firefox usage in Europe, researchers find

Nov 13, 2026

Online product rankings can cut shipping costs without reducing sales, experiment finds

Nov 13, 2026

Large companies lead EU service exports, but smaller firms dominate in some markets

Nov 13, 2026

Cart reminder timing is linked to different shopper responses

Nov 12, 2026

AI labels changed how consumers judged food images in three experiments

Nov 12, 2026

Shared AI tools were linked to higher sales for small online sellers

Nov 12, 2026

An image ad people like may not be the one they remember

Nov 12, 2026

Upfront rental prices changed competition as nightly rates rose in a study

Nov 12, 2026

Showing payment options earlier can influence online purchase decisions

Nov 11, 2026