PV Solar Panels

US implementing steep tariffs on solar products from China

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 00:54, December 17, 2014

The United States announced it will implement steep tariffs on solar products from China and Taiwan, according to a statement from the Department of Commerce on Tuesday.

The department said it wants to implement anti-dumping duties of 26.71 percent to 78.42 percent on imports of most solar panels made in China, in addition to rates of 11.45 percent to 27.55 percent on imports of solar cells made in Taiwan.

The duties will directly affect companies such as China’s Trina Solar Ltd and Suntech Power and Taiwan’s Motech Industries Inc. It still has to be given the green light by the U.S. International Trade Commission – expected to be done by Jan. 29.

The decision was made to close a loophole that let Chinese manufacturers avoid import duties by using cells made in Taiwan. The Chinese companies were selling their products below the cost of manufacture and were benefiting from subsidies from the Chinese government.

“These remedies come just in time to enable the domestic industry to return to conditions of fair trade,” said Mukesh Dulani, president of SolarWorld Americas. “The tariffs and scope set the stage for companies to create new jobs and build or expand factories on US soil.”

“Taxing solar trade undermines both the spirit and efficacy of pledges made by the US and China to work together in the battle against global warming,” Jigar Shah, president of the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy, said in a statement.

solar panels

Concerns that the duties could make solar panels less accessible to consumers

The last time Obama’s administration implemented duties on Chinese solar panels in March 2012, one solar analyst said it wasn’t in the best interest of consumers.

Rob Stone said that the duties probably won’t help the U.S. industry anyway, and will only make solar panels less accessible to consumers.

Mr. Stone said:

“In the end, solar needs prices to go down more from where they are now, even though they’ve come down precipitously,”

Adding:

“This is why this whole thing is so stupid, because it will not help the small, uncompetitive U.S.-based manufacturers.”

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Why tighter credit can disrupt supply chains before orders disappear

Oct 31, 2026

South Africa plans a more open payments system as digital transactions grow

Oct 31, 2026

African cities face a jobs test as urban populations grow

Oct 31, 2026

Online platforms can open foreign markets, but sellers still face costs

Oct 31, 2026

Trade barriers beyond tariffs can keep Balkan exporters from growing

Oct 31, 2026

Off-grid solar reaches more customers, but affordability limits its growth

Oct 31, 2026

World Bank survey finds a wide gap in business innovation across economies

Oct 30, 2026

Air conditioning is adding a growing challenge for electricity grids

Oct 30, 2026

Fewer bidders can make public contracts harder for businesses and taxpayers

Oct 30, 2026

Small firms’ productivity gap is wider in manufacturing than services

Oct 30, 2026

Battery storage is expanding beyond emergency grid support

Oct 30, 2026

Hiring pressure persists in technical, health and teaching jobs, OECD finds

Oct 30, 2026

Small manufacturers face different costs in the shift to new supply chains

Oct 29, 2026

Crowded hedge fund trades can deepen market falls, IMF research finds

Oct 29, 2026

Electronic payments are linked to easier credit for small businesses

Oct 29, 2026

China’s carbon market may reward cleaner plants while increasing output

Oct 29, 2026

Groundwater pumping can create costs that arrive years later

Oct 29, 2026

Commodity shocks are spreading from energy to food and metals

Oct 28, 2026

Why training an AI replacement can create a dilemma for workers and employers

Oct 28, 2026

Why tariff changes can reach importers at different times

Oct 28, 2026