Malicious Apps Thumbnail

Beware of malicious apps, especially when multitasking

Published: 17:47, October 19, 2015

Even the most highly educated among us, which means those with experience at detecting computer security threats, are susceptible to malicious apps that bypass the most secure encryption and gain access to confidential data on a mobile device, warn researchers from North Carolina State University.

Before installing a new app on your mobile device, you need to be mindful of the security risks.

In a presentation at the upcoming HFES 2015 International Annual Meeting in Los Angeles (Oct 26-30), Qian Liu and co-authors, from North Carolina State University, note that human factors/ergonomics research could help designers in the creation of a just-in-time warning system that takes into account the decision-making abilities of the user while alerting him/her that the current conditions – especially while multitasking – may lead to errors.

Malicious appsWhen we are doing several different things at the same time (multitasking), we are more likely to download malicious apps.

Liu and colleagues examined which conditions are most likely to lead to security errors among mobile device users.

In their Annual Meeting paper, ‘Multitasking Increases Stress and Insecure Behavior on Mobile Devices,” they asked sixty-five people to install 24 apps on a Samsung Nexus S mobile phone. The volunteers were aged 19 to 46 and were enrolled in computer science and psychology courses.



Even tech savvy people vulnerable to malicious apps

The participants selected apps from a fake store that offered them in eight categories: shopping, podcasts, maps, food, sports, banking, music and chat.

The store described star ratings, reviews, permissions, and number of reviews for each app. The number of reviews and permissions were identical in each app; the content of the reviews contained security cues which indicated which apps were malicious.

After looking at information about the apps, the volunteers were asked to identify the only safe app while navigating through the store interface and performing two other tasks during multitasking trials.

They also had to rate their stress levels and explain why they selected the app as safe.

These were highly educated individuals who had much greater than average experience detecting computer security threats.

However, they were still vulnerable to the effects of multitasking. The study found that they chose a safe app only about half the time.

Multitasking increases susceptibility

The study showed that multitasking with a mobile device creates stress and encourages non-secure mobile behavior.

Liu said:

“We chose multitasking to focus on because when mobile phone users are doing other things, such as talking with a friend, driving while using apps, or using two or more apps at once, they experience more stress and are more likely to choose unsafe apps.”

A different, recent study discovered 277 malware families in 2014 alone (Hypponen, 2014).

HF/E researchers can help users of mobile devices manage this risk. Mobile devices may offer a partial solution – most of them are equipped with a range of sensors that could vary guards and warnings with context, making them more secure.

However, when mobile users are multitasking, designers could create another level of warnings and guard against error, the researchers said.

Video – Malicious apps

Computer security expert Graham Cluley discusses malicious apps. He says Android systems are currently under the greatest attack.

Veronica Salvador Avatar

Other News

Cart reminder timing is linked to different shopper responses

Nov 12, 2026

AI labels changed how consumers judged food images in three experiments

Nov 12, 2026

Shared AI tools were linked to higher sales for small online sellers

Nov 12, 2026

An image ad people like may not be the one they remember

Nov 12, 2026

Upfront rental prices changed competition as nightly rates rose in a study

Nov 12, 2026

Showing payment options earlier can influence online purchase decisions

Nov 11, 2026

Cash-back offers for positive reviews brought more responses but fewer repeat purchases

Nov 11, 2026

Turning a free business service into a paid one is harder than changing the price

Nov 11, 2026

Small businesses that sought customer feedback reported higher revenue in Rwanda experiment

Nov 11, 2026

Checkbox coupons were less effective than direct discounts in an online shopping experiment

Nov 11, 2026

The way online reviews are organized can make them more useful to shoppers

Nov 11, 2026

AI feedback helped some customer service agents in a workplace study

Nov 11, 2026

In-store screens can increase purchases of advertised products, retail study finds

Nov 11, 2026

A loyalty campaign can lose sales when stores struggle to carry it out

Nov 10, 2026

Offering a choice of discounts can sometimes reduce purchases, study finds

Nov 10, 2026

A fee to place a bid can lift a seller’s profit, but the effect may fade

Nov 10, 2026

Experiences can make loyalty rewards more engaging, retail research finds

Nov 10, 2026

Most emerging-market firms in an IFC survey use AI, but few have embedded it across core operations

Nov 10, 2026

Startups given examples of AI workflows found more uses for the technology

Nov 9, 2026

Showing product costs can change how shoppers judge a brand’s motives

Nov 9, 2026