BP

BP cannot claw back overpayments from Gulf spill disaster

Published: 14:01, September 24, 2014

At the hearing in New Orleans on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier said BP cannot recover hundreds of millions of dollars in overpayments by claimants who it says had inflated their losses.

A US court had accepted in 2013 that the processing of claims by Patrick Juneau had not been fair. So, BP had sought to claw back the money.

Judge Barbier said that BP had told the claimants “if you sign this release, that’s it, it’s over for you. It doesn’t matter if the law changes or not, or if the interpretation of the settlement terms changes for better or worse. I don’t know how you get around it. The only conclusion is that this language bars BP from any attempt at restitution.”

BP had argued that although it stood by the signed settlement, its subsequent implementation was hijacked by Mr. Juneau, the claims administrator, who it claimed misinterpreted the agreement and was exploited by abusive plaintiffs.

Geoff Morrell, BP’s senior vice president for communications, said:

“For BP to have asked for the return of that money was not contrary to the release or any other part of the agreement. It was an attempt to reach the only fair outcome.”

Judge Barbier dismissed BP’s argument with the following statement: “The court finds this is classic hairsplitting.”

BP had initially expected the payout program to total $7.8 billion, however, the final bill is going to be much higher.

Deepwater Horizon Disaster

The fireball from the Deepwater Horizon disaster killed 11 people.

The oil giant has filed several motions challenging what it says are exorbitant fees charged by the program’s administrator, phony claims and over-generous payments.

So far, since the April 2010 disaster aboard the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that killed 11 workers in the Gulf of Mexico and caused the worst offshore oil spill in the history of the United States, BP has sustained over $42 billion in charges.

On September 4th, Judge Barbier found BP grossly negligent in its conduct that resulted in the offshore oil spill. Grossly negligent, instead of just negligent exposes the company to up to $17.6 billion in civil penalties, which is nearly four times the maximum Clean Water Act fine for simple negligence.

BP has only put aside just $3.5 billion for potential penalties.

Judge Carl Barbier assigned 67% of the blame to BP, 30% to Transocean and 3% to Halliburton.

Veronica Salvador Avatar

Other News

Motorola Solutions completes $1.5 billion D-Fend counter-drone acquisition

Aug 23, 2026

Beacon Fen secures consent for 400 MW Lincolnshire solar project

Aug 23, 2026

BJ’s raises profit outlook as gasoline boosts second-quarter sales

Aug 23, 2026

EU battery passport guidance gives companies a 71-point compliance map

Aug 23, 2026

CoStar completes $800 million Zonda acquisition to expand into new-home data

Aug 23, 2026

UK borrows £1.8 billion in July as spending runs above forecast

Aug 22, 2026

WhiteFiber closes $310 million note sale, but AI data center expansion still needs more funding

Aug 22, 2026

Driverless taxis still need workers, and that may shape robotaxi economics

Aug 22, 2026

Why the rare earth bottleneck comes after the mine

Aug 22, 2026

Could offshore wind farms change how much rain falls on Europe?

Aug 22, 2026

Why keeping medicines cool has become big business

Aug 22, 2026

Why airlines rent spare jet engines instead of buying more

Aug 22, 2026

Why merger cost savings do not always reach consumers

Aug 22, 2026

Repeated choices can strengthen later preferences, study finds

Aug 22, 2026

Why the colleague who uses AI may gain an advantage at work

Aug 22, 2026

UK business activity strengthens in August despite continued services job cuts

Aug 22, 2026

Micron plans $10 billion research network for next-generation memory

Aug 21, 2026

YMTC parent seeks 33 billion yuan in Shanghai IPO after profit surge

Aug 21, 2026

Mitsubishi Electric agrees $1.4 billion deal for US power-market software group PCI

Aug 21, 2026

Why a strong ESG reputation can make a downgrade hurt more

Aug 21, 2026