featured-image-standard-abstract-lines-dots-nodes-connecting

IMF head Christine Lagarde said Brexit extension helped avoid a “terrible outcome”

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 19:12, April 14, 2019

The head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, said that the six‑month Brexit extension given to the U.K. by the EU helped avoid a “terrible outcome” that would have put more pressure on an already fragile global economy.

Speaking at the World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings in Washington Christine Lagarde said:

“At least the UK is not leaving on April 12 without a deal. It gives time for continued discussions between the various parties involved in the UK.

“It probably gives time for economic agents to better prepare for all options, particularly industrialists and workers, in order to try to secure their future.

“A no-deal Brexit would have been a terrible outcome”.

However, she warned that continued Brexit uncertainty will have a negative impact on Britain’s economy.

Ms Lagarde said:

“If there was a prolonged uncertainty, we can suspect that the impact on confidence would continue because, you know, whether you’re talking about investors, whether you’re talking about decisions as to where to expand where to set up how to organize a supply chain, people are going to wonder, you know, what comes next and how will it settle? “So it would have a negative impact, no question about it.”

According to the BBC, Ms Lagarde said the Brexit process was “very, very concerning on the one hand and very sad”.

She told journalists: “Having my positive hat on it removes the risk of the no-deal Brexit on April 12, so at least the UK is not leaving on April 12 without a deal.

“We believe that the no deal Brexit would have been a terrible outcome.”

While the IMF is forecasting economic growth in 2020, Ms Lagarde said that forecast was “precarious and subject to downside risks” amid global trade tensions.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Boehringer Ingelheim’s Mexico City expansion targets 5 billion tablets a year

Aug 2, 2026

Why more accurate AI forecasts don’t always make better investment decisions

Aug 1, 2026

The AI boom is inheriting the geography of America’s old energy economy

Jul 31, 2026

Brands scale AI investment as consumers place greater value on reliability, survey finds

Jul 30, 2026

Customers may praise products they helped create even when they fail

Jul 30, 2026

Study links Uber and Lyft to higher local GDP, but overall job effects remain unclear

Jul 30, 2026

Why some industrial parks create thousands of jobs while others create almost none

Jul 29, 2026

Solar farms meet farming as AI robots work beneath the panels

Jul 28, 2026

Simple chemical treatment could make recycled car plastic almost as strong as new

Jul 28, 2026

Leaf spray could give farmers another tool against salty soil

Jul 28, 2026

Product recalls were linked to lower reported tax rates near year-end

Jul 27, 2026

Land degradation is linked to billions in lost farm output

Jul 26, 2026

Chile’s mining disruption exposes a hidden risk in the AI supply chain

Jul 26, 2026

Bad customer matching can make a profitable ad campaign look like a failure

Jul 26, 2026

1% of resumes contain hidden prompts to trick AI hiring tools

Jul 25, 2026

One fund transaction may have sent the wrong signal about bond investors

Jul 25, 2026

How Kuwait is raising $7.85 billion without selling its pipelines

Jul 25, 2026

Why Gruyère makers would rather make less cheese than cut prices

Jul 25, 2026

Consumer distrust grows twice as fast as trust, study finds

Jul 25, 2026

Autonomous vehicles may become mainstream in mines before they do on public roads

Jul 25, 2026