featured-image-standard-abstract-lines-dots-nodes-connecting

Judge denies BP’s attempt to lower maximum $13.7 billion Gulf spill fine

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 23:34, February 19, 2015

BP Plc’s attempt to lower the maximum civil fine it faces from its catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010 was rejected by a U.S. judge on Thursday.

The decision means that the company is likely going to have to shell out $13.7 billion for violating the Clean Water Act.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier agreed with the federal government that the maximum civil penalty for BP could be as much as $4,300 for each barrel of oil that was spilled.

BP was trying to lower the penalty to $3,000 per barrel maximum, which would make the total maximum civil fine $9.57 billion.

Gulf Coast Oil Spill

BP has faced more than $42 billion of costs because of the spill.

It is still unclear how much BP will end up paying for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill as there is still one last step before setting a fine, which involves a civil trial overseen by Barbier.

The judge sided with the government on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could raising the maximum fine.

Barbier said that by accepting BP’s position it “would invalidate nearly every agency’s attempt to inflate civil penalties that can be sought in federal court,”

BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the company strongly disagrees with the decision made. The company said that the Clean Water Act in 1990 made the maximum fine in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct at $3,000 per barrel.

 

“We disagree with the Court’s decision, and continue to believe that neither the EPA nor the Coast Guard have the power to independently inflate the maximum penalty Congress intended,” said Geoff Morrell.

“At the very least, fair notice was never provided as to which of those two agencies possessed the authority to inflate the penalty amount. We therefore believe the original statutory maximum penalty of $3,000 per barrel in the case of a gross negligence finding should remain in force and are considering all of our legal options.”

The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Startups given examples of AI workflows found more uses for the technology

Nov 9, 2026

Showing product costs can change how shoppers judge a brand’s motives

Nov 9, 2026

Hiding most Facebook ads increased users’ time on the platform in a study

Nov 9, 2026

Online sales remain a small share of revenue for many Balkan businesses

Nov 9, 2026

Toast faces FTC lawsuit over restaurant software fees and cancellations

Nov 9, 2026

Fashion ads featuring models with disabilities performed better in a set of tests

Nov 8, 2026

Ad comment moderation showed mixed results in Harvard research

Nov 8, 2026

Board connections are linked to marketing’s influence inside companies

Nov 8, 2026

Customer confidence can fall before it rises with experience, study finds

Nov 8, 2026

Drug buyers often cut promotion while raising prices, research finds

Nov 8, 2026

Confirmation prompts can change subscription choices, but add checkout friction

Nov 8, 2026

Marketplace advertising adds a second cost to reaching online shoppers

Nov 7, 2026

Delivery and payment choices can stop online sales at checkout, DHL survey finds

Nov 7, 2026

AI-translated marketing videos drew mixed reactions in two language tests

Nov 7, 2026

Referrals remain a major source of leads for small businesses, survey finds

Nov 7, 2026

Company size can influence who posts online reviews, research finds

Nov 7, 2026

New-customer ads beat retargeting in a mattress seller’s field experiment

Nov 7, 2026

Marketing strategy can influence whether companies buy or partner, research finds

Nov 7, 2026

Some discounts can reduce sales when customers struggle to qualify

Nov 7, 2026

Large text can make busy social images less engaging, study finds

Nov 6, 2026