featured-image-standard-abstract-lines-dots-nodes-connecting

Judge denies BP’s attempt to lower maximum $13.7 billion Gulf spill fine

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 23:34, February 19, 2015

BP Plc’s attempt to lower the maximum civil fine it faces from its catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010 was rejected by a U.S. judge on Thursday.

The decision means that the company is likely going to have to shell out $13.7 billion for violating the Clean Water Act.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier agreed with the federal government that the maximum civil penalty for BP could be as much as $4,300 for each barrel of oil that was spilled.

BP was trying to lower the penalty to $3,000 per barrel maximum, which would make the total maximum civil fine $9.57 billion.

Gulf Coast Oil Spill

BP has faced more than $42 billion of costs because of the spill.

It is still unclear how much BP will end up paying for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill as there is still one last step before setting a fine, which involves a civil trial overseen by Barbier.

The judge sided with the government on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could raising the maximum fine.

Barbier said that by accepting BP’s position it “would invalidate nearly every agency’s attempt to inflate civil penalties that can be sought in federal court,”

BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the company strongly disagrees with the decision made. The company said that the Clean Water Act in 1990 made the maximum fine in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct at $3,000 per barrel.

 

“We disagree with the Court’s decision, and continue to believe that neither the EPA nor the Coast Guard have the power to independently inflate the maximum penalty Congress intended,” said Geoff Morrell.

“At the very least, fair notice was never provided as to which of those two agencies possessed the authority to inflate the penalty amount. We therefore believe the original statutory maximum penalty of $3,000 per barrel in the case of a gross negligence finding should remain in force and are considering all of our legal options.”

The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

The AI boom is inheriting the geography of America’s old energy economy

Jul 31, 2026

Brands scale AI investment as consumers place greater value on reliability, survey finds

Jul 30, 2026

Customers may praise products they helped create even when they fail

Jul 30, 2026

Study links Uber and Lyft to higher local GDP, but overall job effects remain unclear

Jul 30, 2026

Why some industrial parks create thousands of jobs while others create almost none

Jul 29, 2026

Solar farms meet farming as AI robots work beneath the panels

Jul 28, 2026

Simple chemical treatment could make recycled car plastic almost as strong as new

Jul 28, 2026

Leaf spray could give farmers another tool against salty soil

Jul 28, 2026

Product recalls were linked to lower reported tax rates near year-end

Jul 27, 2026

Land degradation is linked to billions in lost farm output

Jul 26, 2026

Chile’s mining disruption exposes a hidden risk in the AI supply chain

Jul 26, 2026

Bad customer matching can make a profitable ad campaign look like a failure

Jul 26, 2026

1% of resumes contain hidden prompts to trick AI hiring tools

Jul 25, 2026

One fund transaction may have sent the wrong signal about bond investors

Jul 25, 2026

How Kuwait is raising $7.85 billion without selling its pipelines

Jul 25, 2026

Why Gruyère makers would rather make less cheese than cut prices

Jul 25, 2026

Consumer distrust grows twice as fast as trust, study finds

Jul 25, 2026

Autonomous vehicles may become mainstream in mines before they do on public roads

Jul 25, 2026

Allianz to buy HSBC Life Singapore for S$2.7 billion

Jul 24, 2026

Alphabet and Tesla AI spending worries shake tech stocks

Jul 24, 2026