new_coke

The worst business decisions in history

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 05:42, August 25, 2018

Running a business is a challenge. To remain competitive business leaders have to be able to make tough decisions and adapt. This may involve changing a business strategy, launching a new product, foreseeing opportunities in the market, or completely overhauling a company’s corporate culture.

This article features a list of the four worst high profile business decisions that have been made in history.


1. The AOL/Time Warner merger

This is one of the biggest mergers in history and likely the most failed one as well.

At the time, Time Warner wanted to digitize its content and build an online audience, while the internet company AOL wanted access to Time Warner’s cable systems and tangible assets. The $164 billion deal was approved and in January 2001 the two companies merged.

2000px-AOL_Time_Warner_LogoThe merged company failed though, as growth stalled and market share was lost to new high speed broadband providers.

By 2002, the merger resulted in a massive net loss of $99 billion – the largest loss ever reported by a company at the time. The value of AOL stock dropped from $226 billion to about $20 billion.

Time Warner Chief Jeff Bawkes described it as ‘The Biggest Mistake in Corporate History’.


2. “New Coke”

In 1985 the Coca-Cola Company made the misguided decision to change its flagship product Coca-Cola. The company announced that it was changing the formula for its most popular soft drink. The reformulated product, often referred to as “new Coke,” was the first formula change in 99 years.

150px-New_Coke_canThe problem was the product. The Coca-Cola Company underestimated the bond consumers had with the original Coca-Cola drink. Consumers didn’t want “new Coke”.  At one point the company was receiving 1,500 calls a day on its consumer hotline.

In July 1985 the company announced the return of “old” Coca-Cola.

“We set out to change the dynamics of sugar colas in the United States, and we did exactly that — albeit not in the way we had planned,” then chairman and chief executive officer Roberto Goizueta said in 1995 at a special employee event honoring the 10-year anniversary of “new Coke.”

“But the most significant result of ‘new Coke’ by far,” Mr. Goizueta said, “was that it sent an incredibly powerful signal … a signal that we really were ready to do whatever was necessary to build value for the owners of our business.”


3. Excite passing an offer to buy Google for under a million

In 1999, Excite’s chairman and CEO George Bell turned down an offer by Sergey Brin and Larry Page to acquire the search engine they had developed, Google, for $1 million.

Google LogoIn 2014, George Bell was featured on an Internet History Podcast and talked about why Excite turned down the offer.

According to the podcast’s website, Bell said: “I believe that the price was $750,000 in cash, and something like 1% of Excite. The economics of that were really ok to us. The thing that Larry insisted on that we all do recall, is that Larry said, “If we come to work for Excite, you need to rip out all the Excite technology and replace it with Google’s search.” And, ultimately, that’s, in my recollection, where the deal fell apart. Because, we had hundreds of engineers at that point, and culturally, we really were driven by technology. And I didn’t think we could survive.”


4. Blockbuster declining $50 million offer to buy Netflix

In 2000, before on-demand video streaming was a thing, Blockbuster passed an opportunity to acquire Netflix for $50 million. Reed Hastings, founder of Netflix, approached former Blockbuster CEO John Antioco to sell his company. Antioco declined the offer. At the time, Blockbuster was king of the video rental industry.

Netflix
Netflix is now the largest streaming service in the world.

“Management and vision are two separate things. [Netflix was] losing money,” a former Blockbuster exec said in a Variety interview back in 2013, explaining Antioco’s decision.

Blockbuster depended heavily on charging its customers late fees, whereas the Netflix model offered greater variety to consumers, cut retail location costs, and offered subscriptions – eliminating the need to charge late fees.

Blockbuster eventually went bankrupt in 2010 and Netflix is now a multi billion dollar company, around ten times what Blockbuster was worth.


 

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Why invoice fraud remains a business risk as payments go digital

Sep 7, 2026

EV battery recyclers face a long wait for used packs

Sep 6, 2026

France moves business invoicing beyond the emailed PDF

Sep 6, 2026

The financing gap that can stop an export order before it ships

Sep 6, 2026

Singapore sets a benchmark for liquid-cooled AI data centers

Sep 6, 2026

Non-food sales lead a 0.6% decline in eurozone retail trade

Sep 6, 2026

Texas repair law expands access to electronics parts and tools

Sep 6, 2026

Thailand’s high-income push puts smaller firms and regional cities in focus

Sep 6, 2026

Canada’s trade surplus shrinks as exports to the US fall

Sep 5, 2026

El Niño strengthens into 2027, raising risks for food prices, power and trade

Sep 5, 2026

Nvidia agrees to buy Hugging Face for $12.93 billion, pledges to keep platform open

Sep 5, 2026

Global food prices rise as sugar leads August increases

Sep 5, 2026

A weaker currency can lift overseas profits without reviving factories at home

Sep 5, 2026

AI shortcuts may weaken managers’ judgment, researchers warn

Sep 4, 2026

Alibaba updates Qwen3.8 Max as Chinese AI rivals target workplace tools

Sep 3, 2026

Uber and Wayve begin supervised autonomous rides in London

Sep 3, 2026

Dutch central bank raises London share of gold reserves to 32.1%

Sep 3, 2026

Europe’s housing squeeze is becoming a labor market problem

Sep 3, 2026

Vertiv agrees $1.45 billion deal to expand onsite power for AI data centers

Sep 2, 2026

Advanced-economy bond yields are lifting borrowing costs for developing countries

Sep 2, 2026