The definition and meaning of Hard Brexit is one of the ways the United Kingdom could separate itself from the European Union – the other way is with a Soft Brexit. Both terms refer to the closeness or distance of Britain’s relationship with the EU after the divorce has been completed. BREXIT stands for BRitain EXITing the European Union.
On 23rd June, 2016, there was an in-out referendum in the UK regarding its membership of the European Union.
The majority of the British electorate – 52% – voted to Leave, while 48% chose to Remain. Turnout was 71.8%, with over 30 million people voting.
A Hard Brexit would please the electorate – after all, gaining control of the country’s borders was their main reason for voting to leave. Businesses, on the other hand, say that only with a Soft Brexit can the country’s economic future be guaranteed.
Prime Minister Theresa May, who was against leaving the EU during the referendum campaign, says she will respect the will of the electorate. She insists that ‘Brexit means Brexit’, even though there will be a great deal of debate regarding exactly what Brexit means, especially on two issues:
1. How UK companies do business with the EU.
2. How much control Britain regains regarding the movement of EU citizens into the country.
Currently, EU nationals can come and live-work in the UK as if they were in their own country or any other European Union member state.
One of the main concerns leading up to the referendum was border control – regaining the country’s ability to decide who comes into the country, how, who can work, etc. Had border control not been high up in people’s mind, the vote would probably have gone overwhelmingly to the Remain camp.
European Union leaders made it clear in October that there is no way a Hard Brexit – UK having total control over its borders – would be accompanied by unfettered access to the market of 500 million people.
What exactly is a Hard Brexit?
Both terms have not been precisely defined. A Hard Brexit would probably involve Britain refusing to compromise on key EU issues, such as the free movement of people, leaving the single market completely, and trading with the EU as if it were any other nation or trading bloc outside Europe, based solely on WTO (World Trade Organization) rules.
At least in the short-term, until a deal was signed, a Hard Brexit would most likely mean that tariffs of 10% to 20% would be added to exported and imported items. There would probably be other trade restrictions.
It would also mean Britain losing its passporting rights, also known simply as passporting. Passporing refers to exercising the right for a financial institution registered in the European Economic Area (EEA) to do business in any other EEA nation without needing to request further authorization from that country.
Put simply, passporting is a bit like being given a financial passport to operate across the whole European Union plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.
As far as the electors who voted to leave the EU are concerned, a Soft Brexit would be the same as remaining, but without having any say regarding new EU laws. It would be a backwards step.
Soft & Hard Brexit linked to timeline
Some people say that the timeline will also determine whether the country has a Soft or Hard Brexit.
The separation negotiations are expected to take several years – most experts estimate two years at least, others say the whole thing could take from five to ten years.
A Soft Brexit might also refer to a transitional arrangement of some form after Article 50 is invoked. Article 50 is part of the Lisbon Treaty that includes a very basic 5-point plan should any member state wish to leave the EU. Article 50 is what a member state invokes signaling the beginning of exit negotiations; which are meant to be completed within two years.
“During negotiations under Article 50, European Union Treaties and law continue to apply to the UK. If no agreement is reached within 2 years of the UK activating Article 50, the UK would leave the EU without any new agreement being in place.”
What exactly is a Soft Brexit?
A Soft Brexit is a gentle, semi-detached separation, in which the UK gains a certain amount of independence but keeps some of the vital features of its relationship with the European Union.
– EU Market: there would be unfettered access to the EU market, which represents over 50% of all British exports. Maintaining free access to that market is crucial for the country’s economic health and protecting employment, the vast majority of UK businesses say.
– Passporting: British and foreign financial institutions that operate mainly in the City of London would still be able to operate across the whole of the European Union plus three other countries. Business leaders say that maintaining passport rights is the only way to make sure London continues being Europe’s most important financial centre.
– Movement of People: the UK would have to sign up to the free movement of people. European Union citizens would still be able to come to the UK, stay, and work in the country without having to get special work-permits or resident visas.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) 10 October 2016
The British business community would prefer either remaining in the EU or having a very Soft Brexit, while the majority of the country’s adult population – or at least among those who voted in the referendum – want a Hard Brexit.
Some politicians and economists say that most members of the general public would soon change their minds regarding EU separation or membership when they fully understood the economic costs involved.
The pro-Leave camp says that the Remainers as well as businesses and economists have used scare tactics to try to persuade voters to choose to stay in the EU. Since the referendum, virtually all economic indicators (until today, 10th Oct, 2016) have been positive. This does not mean the economists were wrong – perhaps it is still early days.
The pound sterling devalued immediately after the referendum and has not recovered – it is today worth about 15% less than it was before 23rd June. However, a cheaper pound means more competitively-priced exports. Over the past three months British exports have increased.
What route should Prime Minister Theresa May pursue – a Soft Brexit and risk political suicide, or a Hard Brexit and maybe lead the country into the economic wilderness?
The Prime Minister’s dilemma
The Prime Minister has found herself in a Catch 22 situation. A Soft Brexit would theoretically protect the economy, please businesses and secure future investments in the country as well as employment.
However, a Soft Brexit would mean no control regarding immigration from other parts of the EU – something the electorate made clear was a top priority. The electorate would be furious – they would accuse the Government of leading the country into a step backwards; having no control regarding immigration while losing all influence over EU law-making.
A Hard Brexit would please the majority of voters, but would probably come at great economic cost. Mrs. May would eventually be blamed for the likely severe recession and rise in unemployment following a Hard Brexit.
The Government now has to decide what kind of Brexit to aim for, while at the same time bearing in mind:
1. The will of the people.
2. The economy of the country.
3. What deal the heads of states of EU member countries would agree to.
Video – Is UK heading for a Hard Brexit?
This video from the Embassy of Italy in London has comments by Ambassador Pasquale Terracciano who expresses his thoughts regarding a Soft or Hard Brexit in Bloomberg’s The Pulse, presented by Fancine Lacqua.