EU

Starbucks and Fiat must pay €30m each in tax repayments, says EU

Published: 19:27, October 21, 2015

The Netherlands acted illegally by offering Starbucks a sweetheart tax, while Luxembourg, which did the same with FIAT, also acted outside the law, the EU has ruled. The two companies have been told to pay up to €30 million each in tax repayments, EU Competition Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager announced today.

The European Commission wrote:

“The Commission concluded that Luxembourg has granted selective tax advantages to Fiat’s financing company and the Netherlands to Starbucks’ coffee roasting company. In each case, a tax ruling issued by the respective national tax authority artificially lowered the tax paid by the company.”

The Commission added that the tax rulings regarding Fiat and Starbucks were perfectly legal. “They give a company clarity on how its corporate tax will be calculated or on the use of special tax provisions,” it wrote.

Starbucks Fiat
This latest ruling will have the directors of hundreds of companies trembling.

However, the two tax rulings under investigation endorsed complex and artificial methods to establish taxable profits for the firms. “They do not reflect economic reality. They do not reflect economic reality. Both Luxembourg and the Netherlands have been ordered to recover the unpaid tax from Fiat and Starbucks,” it added.


Illegal subsidies

In other words, the Commission sees the tax deals done with Starbucks and Fiat as illegal state subsidies that must be repaid.

This ruling must have sent a chill through the boardrooms of several companies. Many hundreds of businesses have avoided EU taxes by setting up holding companies in countries like Luxembourg.

Tome Fairless, writing in the Wall Street Journal, quoted Robert Willens, a corporate tax adviser in New York and former managing director at Lehman Brothers, who said:

“I definitely think it will dampen investment in Europe [because] uncertainty is the biggest enemy of deals. It will certainly affect valuations. If taxes are higher going forward that will affect the value of the potential merger partner.”

It is clear Ms. Vestager is trying to forge an important legal precedent. Interestingly, she held fire on reaching a decision regarding Amazon in Luxembourg and Apple in Ireland.

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

AI improved patent drafts, but lasting skill gains depended on experience

Oct 23, 2026

Global risk appetite can put company investment on hold

Oct 23, 2026

France’s shorter working week raised productivity without adding jobs at firms

Oct 23, 2026

Venture capital increasingly backs the business of winning customers

Oct 23, 2026

Travel choices and toll revenue shape the gains from congestion pricing

Oct 23, 2026

The cost of losing a job can shape who joins a young company

Oct 23, 2026

Pension payouts can turn patient investors into regular stock sellers

Oct 23, 2026

Going public can open the door to more borrowing, study finds

Oct 23, 2026

Corporate climate targets often change before their deadlines

Oct 22, 2026

Ad auction averages can hide how prices are set, research shows

Oct 22, 2026

California nursing homes cluster just below a staffing-rule cutoff

Oct 22, 2026

Chipmaking expertise crosses borders through suppliers, engineers and investment

Oct 22, 2026

Employer pay differences reach beyond wages into household spending

Oct 22, 2026

Late-payment problems rise among UK firms that offer customer credit

Oct 22, 2026

Repair firms trail recyclers on margins in South Korean study

Oct 22, 2026

Personalized grocery prices could help most shoppers while costing others more

Oct 22, 2026

Board diversity is linked to faster drug recalls, research finds

Oct 22, 2026

Young audiences favor new actors over influencers in UCLA survey

Oct 22, 2026

Added-sugar labels can change which foods shoppers buy

Oct 22, 2026

Stanford’s thermal-noise research advances low-power wireless sensing

Oct 21, 2026