EU

Starbucks and Fiat must pay €30m each in tax repayments, says EU

Published: 19:27, October 21, 2015

The Netherlands acted illegally by offering Starbucks a sweetheart tax, while Luxembourg, which did the same with FIAT, also acted outside the law, the EU has ruled. The two companies have been told to pay up to €30 million each in tax repayments, EU Competition Commissioner, Margrethe Vestager announced today.

The European Commission wrote:

“The Commission concluded that Luxembourg has granted selective tax advantages to Fiat’s financing company and the Netherlands to Starbucks’ coffee roasting company. In each case, a tax ruling issued by the respective national tax authority artificially lowered the tax paid by the company.”

The Commission added that the tax rulings regarding Fiat and Starbucks were perfectly legal. “They give a company clarity on how its corporate tax will be calculated or on the use of special tax provisions,” it wrote.

Starbucks Fiat
This latest ruling will have the directors of hundreds of companies trembling.

However, the two tax rulings under investigation endorsed complex and artificial methods to establish taxable profits for the firms. “They do not reflect economic reality. They do not reflect economic reality. Both Luxembourg and the Netherlands have been ordered to recover the unpaid tax from Fiat and Starbucks,” it added.


Illegal subsidies

In other words, the Commission sees the tax deals done with Starbucks and Fiat as illegal state subsidies that must be repaid.

This ruling must have sent a chill through the boardrooms of several companies. Many hundreds of businesses have avoided EU taxes by setting up holding companies in countries like Luxembourg.

Tome Fairless, writing in the Wall Street Journal, quoted Robert Willens, a corporate tax adviser in New York and former managing director at Lehman Brothers, who said:

“I definitely think it will dampen investment in Europe [because] uncertainty is the biggest enemy of deals. It will certainly affect valuations. If taxes are higher going forward that will affect the value of the potential merger partner.”

It is clear Ms. Vestager is trying to forge an important legal precedent. Interestingly, she held fire on reaching a decision regarding Amazon in Luxembourg and Apple in Ireland.

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Cybersecurity budget research puts expected losses ahead of spending targets

Sep 12, 2026

UK trade deficit narrows to £9 billion over three months

Sep 12, 2026

Munters expands Virginia factory to make data center chillers locally

Sep 12, 2026

Digital literacy report calls for skills training beyond network coverage

Sep 12, 2026

Berkeley’s healthy checkout rule linked to lower soda sales, study finds

Sep 12, 2026

France cuts growth forecast to 0.5% and announces fresh budget measures

Sep 12, 2026

Kroger cuts sales outlook as online growth helps support earnings

Sep 12, 2026

Gasoline pushes US monthly inflation higher ahead of Fed meeting

Sep 12, 2026

How AI is changing the pharmaceutical industry

Sep 11, 2026

UK economy grows 0.4% in July as business services lead gains

Sep 11, 2026

Corporate tax cuts helped firms grow, but income gains favored top earners

Sep 11, 2026

Ayar Labs adds $150 million to bring optical links closer to AI chips

Sep 11, 2026

Quantum study points to 1,000-fold speed gain for state preparation

Sep 11, 2026

AI safety warnings put the pace of development under scrutiny

Sep 11, 2026

Antidepressant study finds a sensitive drug target in fish

Sep 10, 2026

ECB raises deposit rate to 2.50% as energy costs lift inflation

Sep 10, 2026

Adobe revenue rises 13% as its AI subscription business expands

Sep 10, 2026

EU cyber-reporting rules start September 11: what manufacturers must report

Sep 10, 2026

Malaysia’s palm oil stocks rise 7.5% as August exports fall

Sep 10, 2026

TSMC’s August revenue jumps 53.3% as chip sales accelerate

Sep 10, 2026