Netflix partner accused Verizon of slowing traffic

Published: 13:27, July 19, 2014

Level 3, a Netflix partner, accused Verizon of slowing traffic, adding ammunition to Netflix’ argument. Netflix has been complaining for months that the broadband and telecommunications giant refuses to improve its infrastructure. Level 3 says Verizon accidentally admitted guilt.

Netflix, the Internet TV network that provides on-demand streaming media, pays Level 3 to deliver traffic to Internet service providers.

Netflix says that a number of major broadband firms are deliberately letting streaming speeds slow right down so that they can get Netflix to pay up for faster connections.

In fact, Netflix reached paid connection deals with Comcast and Verizon earlier this year.

Netflix says it is not right that the broadband companies abuse their power to gain money.

Did Verizon accidentally admit guilt?

In a blog titled “Verizon’s accidental Mea Cupla“, Vice president of Content and Media at Level 3, Mark Taylor, accuses David Young, vice president of Verizon Regulatory Affairs, of admitting that Verizon is deliberately constraining capacity from its network providers, including Level 3, which Netflix chose to deliver video content to Verizon’s own paying broadband customers.

Mark Taylor of Level 3
Mark Taylor says Verizon accidentally admitted it is slowing down Netflix.

Mr. Taylor writes, regarding Mr. Young’s explanation:

“His explanation for Netflix’s on-screen congestion messages contains a nice little diagram. The diagram shows a lovely uncongested Verizon network, conveniently color-coded in green. It shows a network that has lots of unused capacity at the most busy time of the day.”

“Think about that for a moment: Lots of unused capacity. So point number one is that Verizon has freely admitted that is has the ability to deliver lots of Netflix streams to broadband customers requesting them, at no extra cost. But, for some reason, Verizon has decided that it prefers not to deliver these streams, even though its subscribers have paid it to do so.”

As the cost for Verizon to reduce the congestion at connection points would be “absolutely trivial,” Mr. Taylor wonders whether Verizon simply wants to extract a pound of flesh from its competitors “using the monopoly it has over the only connection to its end-users.”

Mr. Taylor added that Level 3 has been asking Verizon to add interconnection capacity for a long time. It has also asked Verizon to deliver the traffic its customers “are requesting from our customers, but Verizon refuses.”

New York-based Verizon said it is planning a response to Mr. Taylor’s comment, while Netflix said that Level 3 is “highlighting the same purposeful congestion by internet service providers that we have been discussing for months.”

Background on the Netflix vs. Verizon row

At the beginning of June, Verizon told Netflix in a “cease and desist” letter to refrain from telling customers that the sole cause of their slower download speeds was Verizon’s crowded network.

According to Verizon, if Netflix wants to it can connect to every broadband network in the United States, but prefers to use a mish-mash of intermediary networks to reach its customers because it saves money that way. Verizon says Netflix’ slower-speed problem is of its own making.

The problem started at the end of May when Yuri Victor, a Netflix customer, tweeted that when he tried to stream a Netflix movie, the company placed a message on the buffering screen blaming Verizon for the slow speed (see picture below).

Netflix vs. Verizon

The Twitter message went viral and Verizon soon got to hear about it.

In the middle of June, the FCC (Federal Communications Commissions) said it would investigate the Netflix vs. Verizon row.

Tom Wheeler, FCC chair, asked some of his team members to gather data on the dispute from broadband providers, as well as Netflix and Verizon, in order to find out exactly what was happening and “whether consumers are being harmed.”

Mr. Wheeler said:

“I have experienced these problems myself and know how exasperating it can be. Consumers must get what they pay for.”

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Iridium shareholders approve Rocket Lab takeover: what still has to happen

Sep 25, 2026

Akamai’s 11.6 billion dollar Anthropic deal ties cloud revenue to a 5.5 billion dollar buildout

Sep 25, 2026

Bentley completes 350 million pound Crewe investment as it unveils its first electric vehicle

Sep 25, 2026

Falling birth rates did not reduce total output in historical data, NBER study finds

Sep 25, 2026

Cheaper renewable power does not solve the capital problem for poorer countries

Sep 25, 2026

Facial payments may feel novel, but money worries can curb repeat use

Sep 24, 2026

Precision farming cuts water use while raising crop yields, study finds

Sep 24, 2026

EU allocates €505m to Lebanon for recovery, reforms and basic services

Sep 23, 2026

Alcoa raises $2.6bn in notes to fund South32 aluminium-assets deal

Sep 23, 2026

UK workplace health plan targets preventable exits from employment

Sep 23, 2026

IMF says Sri Lanka’s recovery is holding, but the next review is still unresolved

Sep 23, 2026

OECD sees global growth holding up after energy shock, but forecasts higher inflation

Sep 23, 2026

QAD and Redzone plan NVIDIA-powered AI for factory data and production planning

Sep 22, 2026

World Cup pitchside sponsorship raised a cross-border advertising problem

Sep 22, 2026

Hollywood’s biggest budgets still favour male-only teams, study finds

Sep 22, 2026

Why more companies are becoming their own insurers

Sep 22, 2026

EU publishes data-centre rating rules and opens consultation on minimum standards

Sep 21, 2026

ABB launches Infinitus DC portfolio for AI data centers, with first full sites expected in two to three years

Sep 21, 2026

Starbucks selects Chennai for a technology hub, with work set to move in-house over time

Sep 21, 2026

CXMT says its G5 memory platform has entered mass production with more dies per wafer

Sep 21, 2026