Netflix partner accused Verizon of slowing traffic

Published: 13:27, July 19, 2014

Level 3, a Netflix partner, accused Verizon of slowing traffic, adding ammunition to Netflix’ argument. Netflix has been complaining for months that the broadband and telecommunications giant refuses to improve its infrastructure. Level 3 says Verizon accidentally admitted guilt.

Netflix, the Internet TV network that provides on-demand streaming media, pays Level 3 to deliver traffic to Internet service providers.

Netflix says that a number of major broadband firms are deliberately letting streaming speeds slow right down so that they can get Netflix to pay up for faster connections.

In fact, Netflix reached paid connection deals with Comcast and Verizon earlier this year.

Netflix says it is not right that the broadband companies abuse their power to gain money.

Did Verizon accidentally admit guilt?

In a blog titled “Verizon’s accidental Mea Cupla“, Vice president of Content and Media at Level 3, Mark Taylor, accuses David Young, vice president of Verizon Regulatory Affairs, of admitting that Verizon is deliberately constraining capacity from its network providers, including Level 3, which Netflix chose to deliver video content to Verizon’s own paying broadband customers.

Mark Taylor of Level 3
Mark Taylor says Verizon accidentally admitted it is slowing down Netflix.

Mr. Taylor writes, regarding Mr. Young’s explanation:

“His explanation for Netflix’s on-screen congestion messages contains a nice little diagram. The diagram shows a lovely uncongested Verizon network, conveniently color-coded in green. It shows a network that has lots of unused capacity at the most busy time of the day.”

“Think about that for a moment: Lots of unused capacity. So point number one is that Verizon has freely admitted that is has the ability to deliver lots of Netflix streams to broadband customers requesting them, at no extra cost. But, for some reason, Verizon has decided that it prefers not to deliver these streams, even though its subscribers have paid it to do so.”

As the cost for Verizon to reduce the congestion at connection points would be “absolutely trivial,” Mr. Taylor wonders whether Verizon simply wants to extract a pound of flesh from its competitors “using the monopoly it has over the only connection to its end-users.”

Mr. Taylor added that Level 3 has been asking Verizon to add interconnection capacity for a long time. It has also asked Verizon to deliver the traffic its customers “are requesting from our customers, but Verizon refuses.”

New York-based Verizon said it is planning a response to Mr. Taylor’s comment, while Netflix said that Level 3 is “highlighting the same purposeful congestion by internet service providers that we have been discussing for months.”

Background on the Netflix vs. Verizon row

At the beginning of June, Verizon told Netflix in a “cease and desist” letter to refrain from telling customers that the sole cause of their slower download speeds was Verizon’s crowded network.

According to Verizon, if Netflix wants to it can connect to every broadband network in the United States, but prefers to use a mish-mash of intermediary networks to reach its customers because it saves money that way. Verizon says Netflix’ slower-speed problem is of its own making.

The problem started at the end of May when Yuri Victor, a Netflix customer, tweeted that when he tried to stream a Netflix movie, the company placed a message on the buffering screen blaming Verizon for the slow speed (see picture below).

Netflix vs. Verizon

The Twitter message went viral and Verizon soon got to hear about it.

In the middle of June, the FCC (Federal Communications Commissions) said it would investigate the Netflix vs. Verizon row.

Tom Wheeler, FCC chair, asked some of his team members to gather data on the dispute from broadband providers, as well as Netflix and Verizon, in order to find out exactly what was happening and “whether consumers are being harmed.”

Mr. Wheeler said:

“I have experienced these problems myself and know how exasperating it can be. Consumers must get what they pay for.”

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

A change of month can make a sale feel farther away, marketing study suggests

Nov 2, 2026

New and established brands drew different responses to advertising appeals in study

Nov 2, 2026

Community promotions gave lesser-known authors a sales lift in Quebec study

Nov 2, 2026

Believable price guarantees linked to greater trust in retailer survey

Nov 1, 2026

Where customers receive free samples can affect what they do next

Nov 1, 2026

Branded search ads showed no clear sales lift in small business tests

Nov 1, 2026

Tokenized markets promise faster trades, but legal rights and liquidity remain unresolved

Nov 1, 2026

Internet coverage alone cannot close the digital divide, World Bank says

Nov 1, 2026

Energy upgrades can save businesses money, but financing the work remains a hurdle

Nov 1, 2026

Why tighter credit can disrupt supply chains before orders disappear

Oct 31, 2026

South Africa plans a more open payments system as digital transactions grow

Oct 31, 2026

African cities face a jobs test as urban populations grow

Oct 31, 2026

Online platforms can open foreign markets, but sellers still face costs

Oct 31, 2026

Trade barriers beyond tariffs can keep Balkan exporters from growing

Oct 31, 2026

Off-grid solar reaches more customers, but affordability limits its growth

Oct 31, 2026

World Bank survey finds a wide gap in business innovation across economies

Oct 30, 2026

Air conditioning is adding a growing challenge for electricity grids

Oct 30, 2026

Fewer bidders can make public contracts harder for businesses and taxpayers

Oct 30, 2026

Small firms’ productivity gap is wider in manufacturing than services

Oct 30, 2026

Battery storage is expanding beyond emergency grid support

Oct 30, 2026