US flag and Canadian flag

Study: US-Canada free trade agreement didn’t harm workers

Published: 16:14, February 1, 2025

A 16-year study found that the 1989 Canada-US Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which lasted until the early 2000s, did not harm workers, despite a considerable increase in trade between the two nations.

Brian K. Kovak, professor of economics and public policy at Carnegie Mellon’s Heinz College, and Peter M. Morrow, associate professor of economics at the University of Toronto, wrote about their study and findings in the peer-reviewed journal The Review of Economic Studies (citation below).

Prof. Kovak said:

“The bilateral nature of the FTA allowed us to study the effects of both import competition and export expansion in response to a policy change. Our findings have practical implications: Canadian workers are less disrupted when Canada trades with the United States than when it trades with China.”

The two researchers used longitudinal administrative data from Statistics Canada from 1984 to 2004. They focused on what the effects of an increased export expansion and import competition might be on the Canadian labor market.

Professors Kovak and Morrow analyzed how workers’ careers evolved in industries affected by varying Canadian and U.S. tariff (import tax) changes under the Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

While Canadian tariff reductions had some negative impacts and U.S. tariff cuts had positive effects, these effects were minor and short-lived. Over time, workers adapted by finding new jobs in different companies, industries, or sectors, allowing them to regain lost earnings.

Image of US-Canada flags and shaking hands
US President Donald Trump believes free trade agreements with Canada and Mexico are bad for the US economy.

US-Canada Free Trade – Lowering Tariffs

When Canada lowered tariffs, workers’ total years worked during the sixteen years after the start of the FTA were not affected, nor were cumulative earnings.

Put simply, the tariff cuts played out as expected, but workers adapted quickly and managed to recover without long-term setbacks. The findings indicate that the two-way structure of the US-Canada Free Trade Agreement played a key role in helping workers transition smoothly to new opportunities.

Rather than triggering layoffs, Canadian tariff reductions slowed down employment growth largely by less hiring. This helped insulate existing workers.

These findings contrast sharply with most research on the *China Shock, which resulted in lower incomes and layoffs for both new and existing workers.

* The China Shock refers to the economic impact on industries and workers in countries with large manufacturing sectors, such as the US, Canada, Germany, and France after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

Prof. Morrow said:

“Our findings are relatively optimistic and run counter to those of other studies. Canadian workers left affected industries quickly and transitioned to other manufacturing industries, construction, and services, and the bilateral nature of the FTA gave import-competing workers employment options in potential alternative manufacturing industries benefiting from larger U.S. tariff cuts.”


US-Canada Free Trade – a Timely Study

The findings of this latest study are timely because U.S. President Donald Trump, during his election campaign, claimed that free trade deals had harmed American workers. He stated that he would impose hefty tariffs on goods imported from Canada, Mexico, China, and even the European Union.

In an AP article, published on February 1, 2025, Josh Boak wrote:

“In Trump’s view, the 25% tariffs against the two North American allies and a 10% tax on imports from Washington’s chief economic rival are a way for the United States to throw around its financial heft to reshape the world.”

“Trump is honoring promises he made in the 2024 White House campaign that are at the core of his economic and national security philosophy.”

Many economists warn that protectionist measures such as raising tariffs tend to harm the economy by raising prices for consumers and businesses.

US Democratic lawmakers are trying to introduce legislation that would require Trump to obtain congressional approval before imposing higher tariffs. However, as both the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans, they are unlikely to get very far.


Citation

Kovak, B. K., & Morrow, P. M. (2024). The long-run labour market effects of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. The Review of Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdae113

Christian Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Researchers bring quantum chaos under control across 100 qubits

Oct 12, 2026

When the next generation doesn’t want the family business

Oct 11, 2026

Cleveland Fed survey finds businesses unconvinced by stablecoins

Oct 11, 2026

Costs hold back commercial heat pump upgrades, California study finds

Oct 11, 2026

Rein Security raises $25 million to protect enterprise AI agents

Oct 11, 2026

Foreign trips take most of EU residents’ travel spending

Oct 11, 2026

Irish inflation rises to 4.1% as housing and transport costs climb

Oct 11, 2026

Safety reminders reduce unsafe choices in a clinical AI study

Oct 10, 2026

VEIR raises $110 million for superconducting data-center power systems

Oct 10, 2026

EU prepares €52.5 million in calls to help research reach the market

Oct 10, 2026

France secures EU approval for €40.5 million in fuel-cost loan schemes

Oct 10, 2026

EU selects 46 new projects for critical mineral supplies

Oct 10, 2026

Why a port disruption can reach factories far inland

Oct 10, 2026

Sorghum could diversify Europe’s feed crops as the climate warms

Oct 10, 2026

X-ray snapshots reveal how an enzyme builds penicillin’s rings

Oct 9, 2026

Thyssenkrupp opens Pune engineering center focused on vehicle software

Oct 9, 2026

Malaysia plans RM2,000 minimum wage with relief for smaller firms

Oct 9, 2026

Airtel Money’s London flotation puts its payments business in focus

Oct 9, 2026

More US families face heavy debt payments despite rising wealth

Oct 9, 2026

Can bikes and scooters make everyday city travel cheaper?

Oct 8, 2026