PV Solar Panels

Two solar energy firms go bust in the UK, over 1,000 jobs lost

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 23:31, October 8, 2015

closeup of solar panelTwo major solar panel installers have gone into administration over the past two days in the UK.

More than 1,000 jobs are expected to be lost as a result.

Leicester-based Mark Group announced on Wednesday night that it is cutting 939 staff – effective immediately. Climate Energy also went into administration, announcing 30 job cuts.

Many are blaming the recent government cuts to solar panel subsidies as the main cause of their collapse.

Mark Group said that the policy changes on energy efficiency caused a “significant reduction” in installation work.

Mark Group said in a statement: “The turnaround plan, which was already underway, focused on solar PV but the Government’s recent policy announcements mean this is no longer viable.”

A spokesman for Climate Energy said: “The withdrawal of public subsidies is a contributory factor to the failure of the business. However, the business faced other challenges and attempts to diversify the business were also ultimately unsuccessful,”

SunEdison told Greenpeace Energydesk: “We are extremely disappointed that the draconian policy proposals made by the government in August will essentially eliminate the solar PV market in the UK and have made our plans unviable.”

Alasdair Cameron, Friends of the Earth energy campaigner, said that these “huge job losses are likely to be the first of many as Government attacks on efforts to build a low-carbon economy begin to bite.”

“Government policy threatens over 20,000 UK solar jobs – with many more at risk in other green sectors.”

DECC denies claims that it is the government’s fault

However, the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) denied claims that government subsidies are to blame, citing failures on “commercial decisions” as the main reason for the failure of the two firms.

A DECC spokesman said: “All job losses are regrettable and we sympathise with those affected, but commercial decisions are a matter for the company concerned,”

“Our priority is to keep bills as low as possible for hardworking families and businesses, and to build a long-term energy-efficiency system that gives consumers value for money. We are protecting existing investment and billpayers, while reducing our emissions in the most cost-effective way,” he added.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

Product recalls were linked to lower reported tax rates near year-end

Jul 27, 2026

Land degradation is linked to billions in lost farm output

Jul 26, 2026

Chile’s mining disruption exposes a hidden risk in the AI supply chain

Jul 26, 2026

Bad customer matching can make a profitable ad campaign look like a failure

Jul 26, 2026

1% of resumes contain hidden prompts to trick AI hiring tools

Jul 25, 2026

One fund transaction may have sent the wrong signal about bond investors

Jul 25, 2026

How Kuwait is raising $7.85 billion without selling its pipelines

Jul 25, 2026

Why Gruyère makers would rather make less cheese than cut prices

Jul 25, 2026

Consumer distrust grows twice as fast as trust, study finds

Jul 25, 2026

Autonomous vehicles may become mainstream in mines before they do on public roads

Jul 25, 2026

Allianz to buy HSBC Life Singapore for S$2.7 billion

Jul 24, 2026

Alphabet and Tesla AI spending worries shake tech stocks

Jul 24, 2026

What Google’s new AI study tells us about how we really use AI

Jul 24, 2026

Alphabet’s AI spending surge tests investor patience despite strong cloud growth

Jul 23, 2026

Is AI changing how students learn and think? New study investigates

Jul 20, 2026

Apple briefly overtook Nvidia as most valuable company

Jul 17, 2026

US consumer prices fall in June as energy costs drop

Jul 16, 2026

Robots boost productivity in small manufacturers but not exports, study finds

Jul 13, 2026

Why even unbiased AI can seem unfair in job interviews

Jul 12, 2026

Effects of foreign direct investment on rural employment and income

Jul 9, 2026