featured-image-standard-abstract-lines-dots-nodes-connecting

Judge denies BP’s attempt to lower maximum $13.7 billion Gulf spill fine

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 23:34, February 19, 2015

BP Plc’s attempt to lower the maximum civil fine it faces from its catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010 was rejected by a U.S. judge on Thursday.

The decision means that the company is likely going to have to shell out $13.7 billion for violating the Clean Water Act.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier agreed with the federal government that the maximum civil penalty for BP could be as much as $4,300 for each barrel of oil that was spilled.

BP was trying to lower the penalty to $3,000 per barrel maximum, which would make the total maximum civil fine $9.57 billion.

Gulf Coast Oil Spill

BP has faced more than $42 billion of costs because of the spill.

It is still unclear how much BP will end up paying for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill as there is still one last step before setting a fine, which involves a civil trial overseen by Barbier.

The judge sided with the government on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could raising the maximum fine.

Barbier said that by accepting BP’s position it “would invalidate nearly every agency’s attempt to inflate civil penalties that can be sought in federal court,”

BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the company strongly disagrees with the decision made. The company said that the Clean Water Act in 1990 made the maximum fine in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct at $3,000 per barrel.

 

“We disagree with the Court’s decision, and continue to believe that neither the EPA nor the Coast Guard have the power to independently inflate the maximum penalty Congress intended,” said Geoff Morrell.

“At the very least, fair notice was never provided as to which of those two agencies possessed the authority to inflate the penalty amount. We therefore believe the original statutory maximum penalty of $3,000 per barrel in the case of a gross negligence finding should remain in force and are considering all of our legal options.”

The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

EU tourist accommodation records 3.14 billion nights in 2025

Oct 16, 2026

Travelers profit edges higher as investment income sets a record

Oct 16, 2026

Euro-area inflation reaches 3.8% as energy pressure intensifies

Oct 16, 2026

UK regulator proposes new oversight of Microsoft business software

Oct 16, 2026

US industrial output rises 0.7% as utilities outpace factories

Oct 16, 2026

Mercedes-Benz extends Nvidia partnership for automated driving

Oct 16, 2026

Drought can disrupt food supplies far beyond affected farms

Oct 15, 2026

ManpowerGroup picks Becky Frankiewicz to lead its recovery

Oct 15, 2026

Euro area industrial output falls for a third month

Oct 15, 2026

GTCR and Elliott agree $6.1 billion takeover of insurance software group CCC

Oct 15, 2026

UK economy grows 0.1% in August, beating forecasts of a fall

Oct 15, 2026

TSMC forecasts another sales jump after profit rises 68.7%

Oct 15, 2026

EU e-waste collection remains far below its main target

Oct 14, 2026

IMF forecasts 3.1% growth with less room to absorb another shock

Oct 14, 2026

ASML weighs more capacity after a record €11.7 billion quarter

Oct 14, 2026

Buying robots does not always make factories more productive

Oct 13, 2026

Making electronics entirely in the US could raise costs by 41% to 152%

Oct 13, 2026

6G standards take shape while 5G investment continues

Oct 13, 2026

Five growth markets shaped by aging populations and infrastructure needs

Oct 13, 2026

Hybrid demand is reshaping automakers’ investment plans

Oct 13, 2026