featured-image-standard-abstract-lines-dots-nodes-connecting

Judge denies BP’s attempt to lower maximum $13.7 billion Gulf spill fine

Written by Joseph Nordqvist

Published: 23:34, February 19, 2015

BP Plc’s attempt to lower the maximum civil fine it faces from its catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010 was rejected by a U.S. judge on Thursday.

The decision means that the company is likely going to have to shell out $13.7 billion for violating the Clean Water Act.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier agreed with the federal government that the maximum civil penalty for BP could be as much as $4,300 for each barrel of oil that was spilled.

BP was trying to lower the penalty to $3,000 per barrel maximum, which would make the total maximum civil fine $9.57 billion.

Gulf Coast Oil Spill

BP has faced more than $42 billion of costs because of the spill.

It is still unclear how much BP will end up paying for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill as there is still one last step before setting a fine, which involves a civil trial overseen by Barbier.

The judge sided with the government on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could raising the maximum fine.

Barbier said that by accepting BP’s position it “would invalidate nearly every agency’s attempt to inflate civil penalties that can be sought in federal court,”

BP spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the company strongly disagrees with the decision made. The company said that the Clean Water Act in 1990 made the maximum fine in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct at $3,000 per barrel.

 

“We disagree with the Court’s decision, and continue to believe that neither the EPA nor the Coast Guard have the power to independently inflate the maximum penalty Congress intended,” said Geoff Morrell.

“At the very least, fair notice was never provided as to which of those two agencies possessed the authority to inflate the penalty amount. We therefore believe the original statutory maximum penalty of $3,000 per barrel in the case of a gross negligence finding should remain in force and are considering all of our legal options.”

The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 10-md-02179.

Joseph Nordqvist Avatar

Other News

UK borrows £1.8 billion in July as spending runs above forecast

Aug 22, 2026

WhiteFiber closes $310 million note sale, but AI data center expansion still needs more funding

Aug 22, 2026

Driverless taxis still need workers, and that may shape robotaxi economics

Aug 22, 2026

Why the rare earth bottleneck comes after the mine

Aug 22, 2026

Could offshore wind farms change how much rain falls on Europe?

Aug 22, 2026

Why keeping medicines cool has become big business

Aug 22, 2026

Why airlines rent spare jet engines instead of buying more

Aug 22, 2026

Why merger cost savings do not always reach consumers

Aug 22, 2026

Repeated choices can strengthen later preferences, study finds

Aug 22, 2026

Why the colleague who uses AI may gain an advantage at work

Aug 22, 2026

UK business activity strengthens in August despite continued services job cuts

Aug 22, 2026

Micron plans $10 billion research network for next-generation memory

Aug 21, 2026

YMTC parent seeks 33 billion yuan in Shanghai IPO after profit surge

Aug 21, 2026

Mitsubishi Electric agrees $1.4 billion deal for US power-market software group PCI

Aug 21, 2026

Why a strong ESG reputation can make a downgrade hurt more

Aug 21, 2026

Why companies keep paying for software nobody uses

Aug 21, 2026

AI needs more electricity. Why are data centres waiting years to connect to the grid?

Aug 21, 2026

Why effective leadership looks different across countries

Aug 21, 2026

Financial knowledge does not make people immune to scams

Aug 21, 2026

ScanSource agrees $220.5 million MicroAge deal to expand IT services

Aug 20, 2026